SCS Global Services - Setting the standard for sustainability.
MENU

Search form

Climate Solutions

Stabilizing the Climate by 2030 through Radiative Forcing Management
Tobias Schultz, Director, Research and Developmentphone icon510.452.6389 Email

As the pace of climate change is accelerating, so too is our understanding of the factors driving this change. At the core of problem are the emissions and other human activities that are changing the heat balance of the earth, measured as “radiative forcing.” We now know it is possible to get ahead of dangerous climate disruption and temperature rise by managing this excess heat.  Every company,  organization and government jurisdiction has a vital role to play to effectively address the near-term climate crisis before 2030, and contribute to a sustainable climate future. 

Ask for a Free Consultation
  • Service Offerings
  • Responsive Tab 2
  • Responsive Tab 3
  • Responsive Tab 4
Service Offerings

Radiative Forcing Management (RFM) provides the tools companies, organizations and government jurisdictions need to have the greatest positive impact on our climate.  These tools include far more accurate climate footprints than ever before, greater clarity about the scale of solutions required to achieve climate stability before critical temperature thresholds are crossed, and a substantially increased range of options for achieving climate neutrality.

  1. Climate Footprint Verification – Traditional carbon footprints reflect only a small part of the climate change story.  Stabilizing the climate in the critical near-term, and ultimately restoring the Earth to full climate health, requires a more complete understanding of the full range of factors contributing to the problem. Find out more.
  1. Climate Footprint Consulting – Once your RF-based climate footprint is determined, it is possible to choose from a much wider range of effective mitigation opportunities, many of which can be far more cost-effective than previously available. Find out more.
  1. Climate Mitigation Project Pre-Screening ­– Current, planned, and potential mitigation initiatives are evaluated based on a life-cycle assessment framework to identify potential co-benefits, as well as adverse trade-offs, to the climate, environment and human health. In addition, initiatives are analyzed for technological feasibility and cost. Find out more.
  1. Climate Impact Reduction and Climate Neutrality Verification – Through the right combination of climate mitigation approaches, tailored to your organization’s unique profile or reflecting your sphere of influence, it is possible to reduce or entirely offset your climate footprint. Find out more.
  1. Climate Offset Project Validation and Verification –RF accounting is used to evaluate the efficacy of climate mitigation projects that contribute measurably to global RFM goals, or to RF reduction in particularly vulnerable “high-risk” regions of the world.  Find out more.
Unique Features

What makes RFM so powerful as a climate management tool is the truly comprehensive scope of radiative forcing accounting. This accounting is based on the very latest climate and environmental science, covering all emissions and factors contributing to climate change as well as determining co-benefits and adverse trade-offs.  It covers:

  1. Annual greenhouse gases (GHG) – All of the GHG emissions historically addressed under standard carbon footprint and offset calculations and science-based targets (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, sulfur hexafluoride, chlorofluorocarbons, and hydrofluorocarbons).
  1. Legacy GHGs – The accumulated build-up of CO2, methane and other GHG emissions from the past that are still retained in the atmosphere today, still influencing climate, and that will continue to linger for centuries.
  1. Corrected methane ­– Methane is 150-times more potent than carbon dioxide as a climate pollutant during its first year (as compared to normal value of 21-25 times more potent typically attributed to methane).
  1. All short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) – Especially black carbon and tropospherice ozone, which are 52,000-times and 32,000-times more potent respectively than carbon dioxide as climate pollutants while retained in the  atmosphere.
  1. Net reduction of sulfates – Any reduction in such pollutants is included for a full accounting, since they artificially cool the planet even as they contribute to other dangerous human health and environmental conditions on the ground. 
  1. Co-benefit and trade-off assessment – Many of the most effective climate mitigation strategies can have additional benefits for human health or the environment that should be accounted for.  Such strategies can also have adverse impacts, or “trade-offs”, during their life-cycle that must be understood before these approaches are put into practice.
Benefits

RFM provides numerous benefits to companies, organizations, and government jurisdictions, extending well beyond traditional climate services.  Some of these benefits include:

  • Providing new insights into an organization’s current and projected climate footprints, and the efficacy of current and potential science-based targets
  • Demonstrating the extent to which current company or organization climate initiatives (e.g., zero waste, pollution prevention, operational efficiencies) may be yielding more climate benefit than they realize, along with co-benefits to human health and the environment
  • Highlighting new opportunities to reduce an organization’s footprint or to become climate neutral
  • Helping organizations reprioritize initiatives in order to steer investments and resources toward those projects that can produce the greatest climate benefit in the most cost-effective manner
  • Reinforcing the role that technology and innovation will and must play to stabilize climate
  • Strengthening broader organizational sustainability initiatives
  • Identifying opportunities to reduce supply chain risks and reinforce climate resilience
FAQs

What is the goal of Radiative Forcing Management?

The goal is twofold – to address the near-term climate emergency between now and 2030, and to set the world on a path toward a sustainable climate future.  Note that the IPCC has concluded we may exceed the Paris Agreement temperature target anomaly of 1.5°C as early as 2030 if we don’t begin significantly reducing the excess heat trapped in the Earth’s atmosphere before then.

Why do we need Radiative Forcing Management?

The current approach to climate accounting is more than two decades out of date, and leaves out many of the emissions and other factors contributing to climate change.  Lacking a complete accounting of the problem, it is nearly impossible to identify the scale and type of solutions needed to stabilize the climate before we cross critical thresholds.  RFM solves this problem by integrating the most advanced climate science into our climate accounting and mitigation planning, and in the process, opens up whole new avenues to succeed.    

Why SCS?

We are the world’s leading authority on radiative forcing management, bringing to bear more than three decades of expertise in sustainability, climate accounting, life-cycle assessment, and third-party verification.

What is a High-Risk Region?

These are regions of the world that experiencing accelerated climate change impacts or threats.  Examples include regions that are drought-prone, or subject to severe storm activity spawned by warming oceans.  RFM projects may target high-risk regions to protect regional populations, resources and assets from harm.

What data are required for RFM calculations?

By and large, data used for RFM calculations are obtainable from the same data sources used to calculate carbon footprints under traditional carbon accounting protocols, as well as other readily available sources.

What is Radiative Forcing?

Radiative forcing (RF), expressed in watts per square meter (W/m2), is the change in the net radiative flux at the tropopause or top of atmosphere resulting from a change in an external driver of climate change. There are a wide range of external drivers, including greenhouse gases, particulates, aerosols, and other emissions, changes in the albedo of clouds and ground-level surfaces, and even changes in the output of the Sun.  In short, RF is the common, underlying metric relevant to all anthropogenic and biogenic factors influencing the climate system.

For immediate service:

Tobias Schultz, Director, Research and Development phone icon 510.452.6389 Email Tobias